Product Code Database
Example Keywords: undershirt -handheld $33
   » » Wiki: Bhir Mound
Tag Wiki 'Bhir Mound'.
Tag

The Bhir Mound () is an archaeological site in Taxila in the Punjab province of . It contains some of the oldest ruins of Ancient Taxila, dated to sometime around the period 800–525 BC as its earliest layers bear "grooved" Red Burnished Ware,Petrie, Cameron, (2013). "Taxila", in D. K. Chakrabarti and M. Lal (eds.), History of Ancient India III: The Texts, and Political History and Administration till c. 200 BC, Vivekananda International Foundation, Aryan Books International, Delhi, p. 656. the Bhir Mound, along with several other nearby excavations, form part of the Ruins of Taxila – inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1980.


Context
The Bhir Mound archaeological remains represent one stage of the historic city of . The first town in Taxila was situated in the Hathial mound in the southwest corner of the Sirkap site. It lasted from the late second millennium BC until the Achaemenid period, with the Achaemenid period remains located in its Mound B. The Bhir Mound site represents the second city of Taxila, beginning in the pre-Achaemenid period and lasting till the early . The earliest occupation on the Bhir mound began around 800–525 BC, and what now appears to be the second phase might date to the late 6th and 5th centuries BC, as originally suggested by Marshall.Petrie, Cameron, (2013). "Taxila", in D. K. Chakrabarti and M. Lal (eds.), History of Ancient India III: The Texts, and Political History and Administration till c. 200 BC, Vivekananda International Foundation, Aryan Books International, Delhi, p. 656 - 657.


Excavation
The ruins of Bhir Mound were excavated from 1913–1925 by Sir John Marshall. The work was continued by Sir in 1944–1945 and by Dr. Mohammad Sharif in 1966–1967. Further excavations were performed in 1998–2000 by Bahadur Khan and in 2002 by Dr. Ashraf and Mahmud-al-Hassan.

Marshall came to the Bhir Mound project from earlier work in , expecting very much to find a Greek city in Taxila. Klaus Karttunen says that he became more objective later on, but scholars mention various problems with his results. In his report, Marshall proposed that the Bhir Mound city of Taxila was founded by as the capital of the Achaemenid province of . Scholar David Fleming says that the identification was based on 'classical sources and a frankly pro-western bias'. The excavations were conducted without much regard to stratigraphic recording, and the pottery finds were published in such a manner as to preclude a detailed analysis.

The results of Mortimer Wheeler's excavations were never published. Later excavations by Mohammad Sharif were done more carefully with regard to chronological considerations, and they form the basis for the modern assessments.


Ruins
The ruins of the town form an irregular shape measuring around 1 km from north to south and about 600 meters from east to west.

The streets of the city show that they were narrow and the house plans were very irregular. There is little evidence of planning – most of the streets are very haphazard. The houses had no windows to the outside. They opened towards inner courtyards. The courtyard was open and 15 to 20 rooms were arranged around it.


History
John Marshall stated, based on his excavations during 1913–1934, that heavy masonry of the buildings formed the earliest stratum of the Bhir Mound site. He believed that Taxila formed part of the 20th satrapy of (called Hinduš by the Persians or Indos by the Greeks). This claim was considered dubious by several scholars.Pierfrancesco Callieri, India iii. Relations: Achaemenid Period, Encyclopedia Iranica, 15 December 2004.: "There was little in his discussion of archaeological material that would support such an identification, and the Elamite evidence was not available to him." and it is invalidated by the current dating of the Bhir Mound site as beginning before 525 BC as Cameron Petrie suggests. Other scholars doubt if Taxila ever belonged to the Achaemenid Empire.: "With a certain geographical recklessness many have supposed, that as an important early centre Taxila must have been the capital of the Indian dominions of the empire. Taxila, however, did not belong to Gandhara proper, which had a more westerly location, and elsewhere I have tried to show how it is well possible that Taxila never belonged to the empire."

In 326 BC, Alexander the Great conquered the area. surrendered to Alexander and offered him a force of soldiers mounted on . In 316 BC, Chandragupta of Magadha, the founder of the dynasty, conquered . Taxila lost its independence and became a mere provincial capital. Still, the city remained extremely important as a centre of administration, education and trade. During the reign of Chandragupta's grandson , became important and the first monks settled in Taxila. Ashoka is said to have resided here as the vice-king of his father. In 184 BC, the Greeks, who had maintained a kingdom in , invaded and again. From then on, a Greek king resided in Taxila, Demetrius.


Achaemenid period coin hoard
The Bhir Mound coin hoard has revealed numerous coins as well as several coins from the 5th and 4th centuries BC which circulated in the area, at least as far as the during the reign of the , who were in control of the areas as far as Gandhara. Many of these coins are similar to the local coins struck in , and found in the Chaman Hazouri hoard. This is the case in particular for the Achaeminid type of coins of the 5th century,: Picture of Achaemenid siglos coin () with caption "Coins of this type found in (deposited c.350 BC) and Bhir Mound hoards (deposited c.300 BC).": "The silver coins were a Persian siglos, tetradrachms of Alexander the Great and of Philip III Aridaeus, thirty-three silver bars with wheel symbols." as well as the Gandharan bent-bar punch-marked coins, found in large quantities at Bhir Mound.: Picture of Gandharan bent-bar punch-marked coin(), with caption "Silver bent-bar punch-marked coin of Kabul region under the Achaemenid Empire, c.350 BC: Coins of this type found in quantity in Chaman Hazouri and Bhir Mound hoards"

Modern numismatists tend to consider that these Gandharan bent-bar punch-marked coins are the precursors of the Indian punch-marked coins.: "the local coins of the Achaemenid era (...) were the precursors of the bent and punch-marked bars": About the hoard in Kabul: "In the same hoard there were also discovered two series of local silver coins which appear to be the product of local Achaemenid administration. One series (...) was made in a new way, which relates it to the punch-marked silver coins of India. It appears that it was these local coins, using technology adapted from Greek coins, which provided the prototypes for punch-marked coins made in India."; "In the territories to the south of the Hindu Kush the punch-marked coins, descendants of the local coins of the Achaemenid administration in the same area, were issued by the Mauryan kings of India for local circulation."

Coins of Philip III and Alexander the Great were also found in Bhir Mound.

(1987). 9780860544425, B.A.R.. .
: "The hoards from Babylonia, Susa, and the Bhir Mound (40-2) included coins of Alexander and of Philip III (Bhir Mound only), and their few sigloi are all of type jy"

Many Indian punch-marked coins were also found. Bhir Mound finds (1924–1945), at Taxila, Pakistan, includes Maurya coins issued in 248 BCE.


Other sites in the area
There are important ancient Buddhist sites in this area, such as , , and .

Also, there are the remains of other ancient cities that were founded after Bhir Mound, such as and .


See also
  • Achaemenid invasion of the Indus Valley


Bibliography

External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time